Kenny's reply

Here is the complete extract of a comment in reply to Minh Dang's post a few days ago regarding an issue involving Kenny's accused theft of Minh's Calculator. Kenny himself, is currently too lazy to create his own account on this website, and has employed my username to express his viewpoint and contention on this matter. A variety of techniques are utilised in order to strengthen a change in position from the reader. Effectively, Kenny Aulia's letter to the editor succeeds in presenting his idea across to the reader, who is begged to question whether Minh Dang's post has any credibility.

Dear Editor Frankcube,

The story presented accusing one "Kenny Aulia" by one "Minh Dang" is inaccurate, unjustified, and sufficiently flawed to prove the authenticity of the allegation. The allegation, to put it laymen's terms, is "full of shiet!!". If Aulia did indeed 'steal' the calculator from the very conservative pocket of Dang, then why..... and i repeat, WHY would he then proceed to 'tap' Dang on the shoulder??

Was it too proclaim is guilt?? I think not!! There is not a single living being on the universe that is capable of committing such heinous and indeed stupid actions. I have been adequately advised, from a very reliable source, that indeed Aulia was merely indicating to Dang that his calculator had befallen out of his pocket because of the awkward position that Dang insists he sit.

I can also, that allegations against one "Simon Lam", made by "Minh Dang" again, are also false. Dang has misrepresented the text of one Leonardo Da Vinci and manipulated the text to portray a misleading meaning that is indeed false. The allegation against Lam are unfounded, and once again, Dang has MANUFACTURED his own evidence to prove a point that is not validated.

Clearly, and evidently, what this shows is that "Minh Dang" has little, or shall I say, NO CREDIBILITY. Through these unfounded allegations it shows that the man has no integrity and no regard for the ‘good name’ of others. Let me conclude by asking you all one question…. Why would such a being manufacture such unfounded allegations??

From Kenny Aulia

Kenny Aulia utilises a plethora of attacking language, 'inaccurate, unjustified, and sufficiently,' to further enhance his argument which seems in direct opposition to Minh Dang's recent post. Additionally, in the utilization of a rhetorical question, 'why would he then proceed...' is used effectively in begging the reader to question Minh's case. Throughout the letter, a variety of techniques are used which i have now cbf analysing because i dont really have that much time, and i'm lazy.